Banned

by Rick Johansen

Since the late 1970s, I have been what is known as a Guardian reader. You know, a snowflake member of the Council House elite wokerati where political correctness reigns supreme. Anyway, a couple of years ago, I stopped buying a physical copy of the paper, joining the other 65 million Brits who don’t buy a paper and slipped them an annual three figure sum to support their journalism. Last week, I found that the so-called moderators of the on-line comments section had suspended my account. I wrote to them to ask why. Here’s their reply:

Good morning,

Thank you for your email.

Your account has been banned for breaking our community standards, namely point 2, replicated below:

2. We acknowledge criticism of the articles we publish, but will not allow misrepresentation of the Guardian and our journalists to be published on our website. For the sake of robust debate, we will distinguish between constructive, focused argument and smear tactics.


You had served multiple premoderation sanctions in the past for comments of a similar nature, and at this point we had no choice but to ban your account.

Criticism and disagreement with the article is perfectly valid, however our articles are published in good faith, so we take exception to the claim that it is “massive ego”, “cyber-bully”, “yet another Oxbridge Grauniad columnist”, and repeatedly “[their] real enemy: Labour”. There is a way to argue an opinion without resorting to remarks like this.

Repeatedly mentioning that you had cancelled your subscription to the paper is outside the bounds of our Community Standards as well – off-topic and derogatory towards the Guardian as a whole. You should appreciate that the moderation team has no access to the subscription records in order to ensure that we don’t have one rule for subscribers and one rule for others. We have to apply the rules regardless.

Bans are not necessarily permanent, but we don’t immediately reverse bans as a matter of course. If you contact us again following our standard three months cooling-off period and still want to comment we will review the situation and can look into reinstating your account then.

All the best,

(Name removed)
Community Moderator

I realise that this could easily degenerate into a “he said, she said” debate because you, my loyal reader, are highly unlikely to trawl through several dozen articles over two years to comments as to how I broke the rules. But I plead guilty to having made the comments they emphasise. I have, once, referred to the hard left writer Owen Jones as “cyber bully” with a “massive ego” because, in my view, he is and he has. It is simply a matter of fact that many “Grauniad” columnists are Oxbridge educated (hello again, Owen) and that their more left wing columnists attack Labour with as much energy as they attack the Tories.
The hard left columnists have an agenda, which has included and to an extent still includes open support for hard left politics. They were and are supporters of Jeremy Corbyn and are highly critical of mere mainstream Labour supporters and MPs. Labour leader Keir Starmer has been repeatedly called a “liar” by – yes, yes: again – Owen Jones but for some reason he enjoys so-called free speech in the on-line and paper editions whereas some readers don’t.
I have, indeed, referred frequently to cancelling my subscription in the comments section on the grounds that I did just that. I resented paying the wages of columnists who repeatedly make political and personal attacks on senior Labour politicians. But according to The Guardian, I am not allowed to say what I really believe about the motives of such columnists.
Oddly, they do not mention my frequent praise for Marina Hyde, John Crace, Raphael Behr, John Harris and countless others but then I suppose praise is within their rules.
I had no idea I had served “multiple premoderation sanctions”, possibly because there are often long periods when I simply don’t offer comment. They must too have reinstated me without saying anything. Well, thanks for that.
I’ve got nothing to cool-off about so in three months time I won’t be getting on my hands and knees to beg the paper to allow me to post only comments that the moderators like. Sod that. Instead, I’ll cancel my online subscription too and keep the extra couple of quid a week I pay them and give it to a food bank instead.
When the likes of Jones, Aditya Chakrabortty and Andy Beckett are free to make personal and political attacks on people but I am denied the freedom to call them out for what I consider them to be, then something has gone wrong. I’m not getting into a debate about it with them. Their attacks are free speech and mine are “smear tactics”. Fuck that. They’re not having my money anymore.

You may also like

1 comment

Anonymous November 1, 2022 - 09:51

5

Comments are closed.